Its true, I'm still not done with the prototype.  Its really taken much longer than I had expected.  I don't want to rush this though.  Trinity is really kicking ass and its super close to done.  Its actually inspired me quite a bit to do some cool stuff - like build a vintage-style tube console.  I have learned much along this journey and it really excites me for the future.  Joe, from Bamboo Room Studio's is the first supporter and investor of this project, so I would like to thank him again for his patience and support.  

Upon testing today, the preamp exhibited 70dB of gain with the Baxandall passive EQ engaged (a big source of volume loss).  That's a milestone, but yesterday the preamp was oscillating when I turned up the volume too much.  Fixed that as well.  Just needed more shielded wire inside.  Also, the noise is practically non-existent.  The tone is pretty good and probably even awesome by most standards, but I would like it to be a little less colorful and a bit more perfect.  Unfortunately, that will come at a price.  Todays tests were conducted with no negative feedback in the signal path.  By employing some negative feedback I'll be able to get the preamp sounding less colorful and more pristine, but at the cost of gain.  Its completely variable and can be adjusted to taste, but I fear that it will dip into the 60dB range or lower once I have it sounding the way I really want it to sound.  I'm trying my hardest to avoid having 3 tubes per channel - it currently has two.  That extra tube per channel would require a much more expensive power supply, the extra pair of tubes, and additional resistors, caps, wire, labor, etc.  I really don't want to see this thing escalate into ultra expensive land.  In the end I will do whatever is necessary to get it sounding exactly the way I want... and I am damn picky.  Tomorrow I will dial in some negative feedback to taste and hope the overall gain of the preamp stays at or above 60dB.  Fingers crossed.  

You may have heard about the mic preamp/channel strip I've been designing if you follow this blog or the LBA Facebook feed.  It has been a rough battle and at times, like yesterday morning I have felt so completely frustrated.  The difficulty has been trying to find a balance between all the traits I want it to have.  Low noise, High output volume (70dB minimum), wide and flat bandwidth, low distortion, and an equalizer that works well.  It has been a serious challenge to meet all of these design goals, which is why I have tried every single amplifier topology I could possibly think of and even a few I couldn't (lost count, but easily +50 different designs).  There was one design that I drew up a schematic for because it exhibited most of the traits, but it had a little too much noise at full volume, only had 60dB of gain, and there was significant insertion loss upon engaging the EQ.  That preamp design I have thought about going back to because I could not, for the life of me, come up with something that could outperform it until last night.  Finally, I feel like I achieved success.  I will be doing elaborate testing today to determine its actual performance specs, but this new design exhibits all the traits and sounds absolutely fantastic!  I was very pleased and then I engaged the EQ.  It would have been impossible for me to have a wider smile on my face.  WOW, now that's an equalizer!  This is a Baxandall shelving EQ - passive of course, because that's how I roll.  The bass is deep, the treble is high and its damn sexy sounding.  The way that I designed this one, there is no audible insertion loss from turning on the EQ, but rather it was slightly louder.  The EQ circuit has its own triode powering it (1/2 of a 12AX7).  Bypass the EQ and you have one less triode in the circuit.  One might think you could lose a little something good or gain a little something bad by having an additional gain stage, but that couldn't be more wrong.  Since the EQ was slightly louder I wanted to dial it back, but I did it in the best way possible - negative feedback.  Using just the right amount of negative feedback in the EQ circuit I was able to match the volume bypassed to active.  The major benefit to using feedback this way is an extended frequency response and lower distortion, which counteracts the negative effects of having another gain stage.  I feel the sound is as close to perfect as God will allow.  I have decided to go with this design even if the gain is a little on the low side, which it may very well be.  Upon testing later today I hope its in the 70dB ball park, but I will be satisfied if its as low as 65dB.  

Here are the current features of Trinity, though some things may change:

• Two channels, each with 3 inputs.  Mic, Line, and front panel DI.  The Mic/Line is a switch on the front panel, with one XLR in/out per channel on the back side.  
•  Triode powered throughout.  The input is a single triode (1/2 12AX7) per channel, followed by a 6922 dual triode output section.  Engaging the EQ adds one more triode - the other 1/2 of a 12AX7.  4 tubes total in this box (2 per channel).  
• Switches for phase reversal, EQ in/out, phantom power, mic/line, low cut filter, and frequency selectors for the EQ.  
• Dual analog VU meters
• The EQ section is a passive Baxandall shelving EQ with 2 frequency choices for bass and 2 for treble.  The low cut is inductor based, which is far more expensive to implement than the common capacitor based low cut, but it allows for a steeper cutoff slope.  Its effect starts to be realized at 75Hz, but becomes obvious at 50Hz.      
• External power supply for low noise operation. 
• This will be the first LBA product which utilizes solid state components, although the solid state stuff is completely limited to the power supply only.  The heater filament power section is DC powered and regulated for quiet, hum free operation.  This and the high voltage B+ are silicon diode rectified, which to my ears creates tighter sounding lows and more focused imaging.  The B+ regulation holds true to the LBA way of neon tubes, of which there are two.    

Trinity has me really thinking big.  Mixing board big!  I can imaging having four Triinity-style units connected to a summing network with pan controls and a makeup amp for a very serious 8 channel tube Mixer.  Believe me, that is absolutely coming up!  I just need $10,000 first!  lol.